In order to judge
the quality of a
report, you must know what the
objectives
were when the report was
requested. Therefore, please take a look at this assignment memo
first, and then look at the report and compare. Ask yourself,
does the report address the objectives? Are the objectives
clearly expressed in the Introduction? Do we find out in the
conclusions how the objectives were met? These are the important
questions when assessing a report.
Assignment Memo
Zimbra Collaboration Suite |
fmorriso@mtu.edu |
objectives for make-up CM3215 lab |
Monday, April 07, 2014:56:23
PM |
From: |
|
To: |
fmorriso@mtu.edu |
Cc: |
|
Good afternoon Dr. Morrison,
As we discussed today, I would like your help with some laboratory work
for CM3215 Fundamentals of Chemical Engineering Lab.
Please investigate the reliability and reproducibility of the 8
Bourdon gauge pairs that are associated with each of the 8 lab stations
in 19-103 (CM3215 lab). Please present your results in terms of
Fanning friction factor versus Reynolds number. I would like you to
explore the
widest range of Reynolds number possible for the 1/4" pipe only (no
need to do 3/8" or 1/2"). If you have any problems or discover
any inaccuracies in the lab setup, please let me know.
I look forward to seeing how these data turn out. If you need any
assistance from me, please feel free to contact me.
best wishes,
Dr. Davis Hubbard
The report is at this
link:
CM3215ExampleReport.pdf