Laboratory
and Modeling Studies of Cloud Susceptibility to Hygroscopic Seeding
Can we make it rain? The question is deceptively simple, but like
many seemingly simple queries, it has a nuanced answer. Research over the past 70 years
shows that we can, in fact, make it rain (or snow). However, that same body of research
also shows that the very steps we take to enhance precipitation, might decrease, or worse,
prevent it. The complete answer to “Can we make it rain?” isn’t “yes” or “no”; it
is, instead, “Maybe.” You must know which clouds will be susceptible to intervention,
and you must know which interventions will be effective. We
address some of those fundamental questions in order to make operational precipitation enhancement
more reliable.
Our
primary tools are the Michigan Tech
Pi Chamber, a one-of-a-kind
facility where we can create and sustain turbulent cloud conditions for
hours at a time, and state-of-the-art modeling platforms, which enable
us to extend our understanding ofthe experiments in the chamber.
Objectives
Polluted clouds (the droplet number concentration is high and the droplets are small)
1. Understand the response to hygroscopic seeding materials, salt and
NaCl-TiO2 in particular.
2. Understand the response to dust.
3. Understand the response to hygroscopic flare material, used operationally in cloud seeding efforts.
4. Understand the response to the
introduction of charge.
Clouds with moderate droplet concentrations
1. Understand the response to hygroscopic seeding materials, salt and
NaCl-TiO2 in particular.
2. Understand the response to dust.
3. Understand the response to hygroscopic flare material, used operationally in cloud seeding efforts.
4. Understand the response to the
introduction of charge.

Midproject site review
The
midproject site review was Sept. 3, 4, and 5 of 2025. Michigan Tech
hosted four members of the review team, as well as collaborators from
Mesa Photonics and WMI (collaborators from Utah participated remotely)
The visit also coincided (by design) with the start of the second phase
of intensive experiments in the chamber. In the picture to
the right, Raymond Shaw is explaining operation of the chamber to
members of the review team and Cantrell.