Reserve Text from Bruce Nicoll, Cliff's Notes Study Guide to The Canterbury Tales. Lincoln: Cliff's Notes, 1964.
|
[32] his coffers. She
derided the husband who considered her as property. She denounced men
who refused her the liberty of visiting her friends for women, like
men, like freedom. She decried the husband who suspected her chastity
was in danger every time she smiled at another gentleman to whom she
wished only to be courteous. She denounced the husband who hired spies
to determine if she was unfaithful, and indeed, hired her own witnesses
to testify to her faithfulness to her marriage bed. [33]
Summary The countryside was revolted by the knight's act, and King Arthur was petitioned to bring the knight to justice. The king condemned the knight to death. The queen, however, begged the king to permit her to pass judgment on .the knight. When brought before her, the queen informed him he would live or die depending upon how successfully he answered this question: "What is the thing that women most desire?" The knight confessed he did not have a ready answer; so the gracious queen bade him return within one year. The knight roamed from place to place. Some women said they wanted wealth and treasure.. Others said jollity and pleasure. Others said it was to be gratified and flattered. And so it went. At each place he heard a different answer. He rode toward
King Arthur's court in a dejected mood. Suddenly, in a clearing in the
wood, he saw twenty-four maidens dancing and singing. But as he approached
them they disappeared, as if by magic. There was not a living creature
to be seen save an old woman, whose foul looks exceeded anything the
knight had ever seen before. The knight explained his problem. The old woman said she could provide the answer, provided that he would do what she would require for saving his life. The knight agreed, and they journeyed to the Court. Before the queen the knight said he had the answer to what women desired most, and the queen bade him speak.
The knight responded that women most desire sovereignty over their husbands. None of the women of the Court could deny the validity of this answer. The knight was acquitted. Then the old crone told the Court she had supplied the knight's answer. In exchange the knight had, upon his honor, agreed to honor any request she made of him. She said that she would settle for nothing less than to be his very wife and love. The knight, in agony, agreed to wed her. On their wedding night the knight turned restlessly paying no heed to the foul woman lying next to him in bed. She said, "Is this how knights treat their wives upon the whole?' " Then the knight confessed that her age, ugliness, and low breeding were repulsive to him. The old hag then gives the knight a long lecture in which she reminds him that true gentility is not a matter of appearances but rather virtue is the true mark of the gentle and noble. And poverty is not to be spurned because Christ Himself was a poor man as were many of the fathers of the church and all saints. All the Christian and even pagan authorities say that poverty can lead a person to salvation. Then she reminds him that her looks can be viewed as an asset. If she were beautiful, there would be many men who would desire her; so as long as she is old and ugly, he can be assured that he has a virtuous wife. She offers him a choice: an old ugly hag such as she, but still a loyal, true and humble wife, or a beautiful woman with whom he must take his chances in the covetousness of handsome men who would visit their home because of her and not him. The knight groaned and said the choice was hers. " 'And have I won the mastery?'" she said. "'Since I'm to choose and rule as I think fit?' " "'Certainly, wife,'" the knight answered. "'Kiss me,'" she said. "'...On my honor you shall find me both.. .fair and faithful as a wife... Look at me' " she said. The knight turned, and she was indeed now a young and lovely woman. And so, the Wife concluded, they lived blissfully ever after. Commentary
Chaucer's time, the literature was filled with the favorite theme of vilifying the frailty of woman. Chaucer's tale, however, is not a moral diatribe for or against woman. He has created a woman in the person of the Wife of Bath who both exemplifies all that has been charged against women but openly glories in the possession of these qualities. Chaucer goes further. He asks the reader to accept woman's point of view and, perhaps, even feel some sympathy for her. Chaucer does not make it clear whether he sympathizes with the Wife's opinion of marriage and celibacy, but it is obvious that he did not agree with the prevailing notions of his time about celibacy. In Chaucer's time, as in a lesser degree today, a second marriage was considered sinful. The Wife's Prologue has been described, therefore, as a revolutionary document. This is why Chaucer has the Wife so carefully review the words of God as revealed in scripture. Nowhere, she confesses, can she find a stricture against more than one marriage save the rebuke Jesus gave the woman of Samaria about her five husbands. But this, she confesses, she cannot understand. There was also, in Chaucer's time, considerable praise for perpetual virginity. The Wife now departs from holy writ and appeals to common sense. If everyone should practice virginity, who is to beget more virgins? The truly remarkable aspect of The Wife of Bath's Prologue however, is not her argument with the mores of her time, but the very wonderful portrait of a human being. She tells the company she married her first three husbands for their money, and each of them died in an effort to satisfy her lust. Her fourth was a reveler who made her jealous and the fifth a young man who tried to lord it over her and when she had mastered him, he ungraciously died. Surely, she moralizes, is this not the tribulation of marriage? Despite her brash accounting of marriage, one gets the impression she is not sure of herself when she exclaims, "Alas, that every love was sin!" Chaucer has given us a portrait of an immoral woman, a coarse creature to shock her age. But the author does not apologize for her. He leaves the moral arguments in balance. One can only conclude that he believes that unbridled sensuousness is not the key to happiness. The Wife of Bath's
Tale simply underscores the Prologue. Here she again pleads for the
emancipation of women in the Middle Ages. Many authorities believe that
it was not Chaucer's intention to change the filthy hag literally into
a beautiful woman. Rather it is a change from a kind of ugliness into
a kind of beauty. Similar tales were widespread in Chaucer's time and
he has done little to disguise the fact that he borrowed heavily from
them in devising his story.
|